MLB Data Warehouse

MLB Data Warehouse

Share this post

MLB Data Warehouse
MLB Data Warehouse
Pitch Arsenal Archetyping

Pitch Arsenal Archetyping

An exploration of the league's different, better, and best types of pitch mixes

Jon A's avatar
Jon A
Jun 29, 2023
∙ Paid
1

Share this post

MLB Data Warehouse
MLB Data Warehouse
Pitch Arsenal Archetyping
Share

It’s hard and irresponsible to put players in a box, but that’s what I’m here to do.

I want to try to group pitchers together based on some findings about their pitch arsenal. What made me start thinking about this was finding all of these young pitchers that have a really good slider or changeup, but were without a good enough fastball to back it up. That seems to happen a lot, and it really does hold pitchers back.

So I went further with it and generated a data set that has a summary of each pitcher’s arsenal. Here is what it looks like right now, but there might be more things added by the time I’m done with this. I tend to write these pieces while doing the coding/research, so they evolve (or maybe devolve) as I go.

  • Arsenal depth = how many pitches he throws >10%

  • Primary FB = most commonly thrown fastball (four-seamer, sinker, or cutter)

  • Primary FB Score = Strike% above average for that fastball

  • Primary Non FB = most commonly thrown non fastball

  • Primary Non FB Score = Strike% above average for that non-fastball

  • Duo Score = The scores added together

  • FB Count = How many of the 3 fastball variations the pitcher throws above 10%


So let’s get into some archetypes. I am being a bit simplistic here in just using Strike%. There are other important things as well, but I didn’t want to get into weighing different metrics together and whatnot, and if I had to just pick one stat for this kind of thing - Strike% made sense.


Lacking a Fastball

The archetype that inspired this post. The guy with the sweet offspeed/breaking pitch that can never really get setup because the fastball doesn’t work.

Gavin Stone is an example. In his short time in the bigs, he posted a sweet 23.5% SwStr% on his slider and a very nice 19.3% mark on his changeup. However, the fastball was awful.

His fastball went for a strike just 40% of the time, a horrible number, and got blasted to the tune of a .407 xwOBA.

Other names in this group

  • Julio Teheran

  • Bryce Elder

  • Drey Jameson

  • Ken Waldichuk

  • Daniel Lynch

  • Edward Cabrera

  • Brandon Bielak


Lacking a Complement

Louie Varland is a decent representative of this. 73% of his pitches are four-seamers or cutters, but he has nothing else to fall back on with just 25% usage of a bad slider/changeup duo.

He gets a bit of a pass with the cutter there, because that can sort of function like a breaking pitch, but there’s just not wipeout, putaway pitch here (yet). That, plus some other things, got him sent back to the minor leagues, where I’m guessing he’ll be working on that slider.

Other names

  • Joey Lucchesi

  • Bryan Woo

  • Bryce Miller

  • Alek Manoah

  • Bobby Miller

Not super surprising to see the Millers and Woo here. These are guys who tore up the minors largely with high-powered fastballs. And in each case, their fastball is working well in the Majors.

Woo throws 77% FF + SI, and the slider at 19% usage has a “fine” but not great 15.8% SwStr% and a 38% Strike%.

As for Bryce Miller, he has taken heavy FF usage to a new level, throwing the four-seamer 67% of the time this year. It has a good 53% Strke% and 12.7% SwStr%, but you can see why he throws it so much - his slider has earned just a 40% Strike%. The curveball has performed pretty well, but he’s only thrown it 6% of the time - so maybe the good performance is just because it’s so unexpected.

And then for Bobby, he has a pitch mix that is five-deep (SI 34%, SL 23%, CH 16%, FF 15%, CU 11%), but all of those pitches are more “good” than “great”. Out of this group, I’d take him - just because of the fact that he has so many different options to improve on. More bullets in the chamber.


The Fastball Variation

The Lance Lynn group! I really like a pitcher that can throw all of a sinker, four-seamer, and cutter at a hitter - that takes them a long way. It’s not to say you can make that your whole living, but it does take a lot of pressure off the slider/curve/change you do have. The full list of pitchers with all three variations working above 10% usage:

  • Lynn

  • Syndergaard

  • Wacha

  • May

  • Darvish

  • E Rodriguez

  • Rasmussen

  • Teheran

  • M Keller

  • Blackburn

  • Houck

  • Martinez

  • Suarez

  • S Gray

  • Strahm

  • Kelly

  • Overton

  • Wesneski

  • C Anderson

  • Civale

  • T Walker

  • Taillon

  • Gibson

  • Rea

  • Kremer

  • Wainwright

  • Davies

If we filter that down to pitchers that also have a non-fastball above the league average by 5%, we get this list:

  • Wacha

  • Teheran

  • Darvish

  • Martinez

  • S Gray

  • Kelly

  • Overton

  • Suarez

  • Blackburn

  • Houck

  • Wesneski

  • Strahm

  • C Anderson

Yes, that’s Chase Anderson - which casts this group in a not-very-shiny light, he is awful.

What you can tend to get from a pitcher like this is a bunch of called strikes and/or weak contact, like Mitch Keller has shown us this year. This is intuitive, I think, because I would imagine these fastballs are easier to mask/tunnel together as compared to tunneling a four-seamer with a slider or something you have to use a lot different arm action on.

To be frank, I’m speaking out of turn here - I don’t really know much about pitching itself, so correct me if I’m wrong.


The Elite Duo

If we just add together the primary fastball and primary non-fastball scores, we get this top 20. This is effectively a list of the best one-two punches in the league as judged by strike rate.

  1. Springs

  2. Strider

  3. Webb

  4. Lopez

  5. K Crawford

  6. Bello

  7. Ryan

  8. Ohtani

  9. deGrom

  10. Wacha

  11. Glasnow

  12. Snell

  13. Severino

  14. Alcantara

  15. Ober

  16. R Olson

  17. Whitlock

  18. Castillo

  19. Eflin

  20. German

Mostly guys we regard very highly already, but also some more surprising names here like Kutter, Bello, Wacha, and Olson.


So there are four groupings. There are plenty more, and really, pitchers should be looked at individually - but I thought it would be interesting to do this, and to me, it was.

The full data set is available for paid subs below the paywall. Thanks for reading!

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Jon A
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share